Jascha Wendelstein
Corneal laser · Zurich

Laser eye treatment — the methods, explained clearly.

A corneal laser can correct short-sightedness, long-sightedness and astigmatism, so you become more independent of glasses and contact lenses in everyday life. There are several methods for this, none is universally "the best". Which one suits you depends on your cornea, your refractive error and your daily life. We work that out together.

The methods at a glance

The methods differ mainly in how the cornea is accessed and how the tissue is reshaped. Each has its own profile, with strengths and with trade-offs.

PRK / transPRK ablation at the surface Femto-LASIK flap + ablation beneath Lenticule extraction tissue disc removed
Schematic illustration of the three approaches, not to scale.

Surface treatment: PRK / transPRK

The cornea is reshaped directly at the surface, without creating a flap. With transPRK, the laser also removes the topmost cell layer without contact.

Profile: works without a flap and leaves the deeper corneal layers untouched, an option when the cornea is thinner or borderline, or when certain risk or occupational profiles favour it. In return, the surface heals over a few days, during which vision can be blurry and the eye irritated.

Femto-LASIK: flap + excimer laser

A femtosecond laser first creates a thin, hinged corneal flap. Beneath it, an excimer laser reshapes the cornea; the flap is then folded back.

Profile: usually fast visual recovery and little discomfort after the procedure, broadly applicable and readily re-treatable if needed. It requires sufficient corneal thickness; the flap is a factor of its own that we take into account in the suitability assessment.

Lenticule extraction (SMILE / CLEAR / KLEX)

A femtosecond laser shapes a fine disc of tissue (lenticule) inside the cornea, which is removed through a small incision, without a flap.

Profile: flapless and with a small access incision. The treatment range and the way a possible later re-treatment is handled differ from LASIK. What that means for you depends on your measurements.

How is the treatment planned?

It is not only the method that matters, but also the ablation profile, how the laser reshapes the cornea in detail. Depending on the findings, I choose:

Wavefront-optimised, an established standard profile that takes the cornea's natural shape into account.
Topography-guided, based on a precise measurement of your corneal surface, useful for example with an irregular cornea.
Wavefront-guided, based on the individual optical aberrations of your eye.

Which profile fits follows from your diagnostics, not from a blanket rule.

And for cataract? — laser in lens surgery (FLACS)

For cataract surgery too, a femtosecond laser can take over individual steps (FLACS). As this is a question about cataract surgery, I explain it fully and honestly there: → FLACS in cataract surgery.

When the result isn't quite on target — fine-tuning after lens surgery

Precise calculation aims to hit your vision exactly after lens surgery. The eye, however, is biology, and in some cases a small residual refractive error remains. This is not a problem without a remedy: it can be fine-tuned afterwards, with a corneal laser or with an additional, supplementary lens (add-on lens). Which route fits depends on your eye and the type of deviation; for me, that too is part of reaching the desired result together.

Therapeutic laser (PTK) — not for correction, but for the surface

Not every laser treatment serves independence from glasses. For certain diseases of the corneal surface, the laser can be used therapeutically (phototherapeutic keratectomy, PTK), for example in epithelial basement membrane dystrophy (map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy, EBMD), recurrent erosions or superficial corneal scars. The aim is a smoother, more stable corneal surface and fewer symptoms, not the correction of a refractive error. Whether PTK makes sense in your case is determined by the examination.

Which method suits me?

The honest answer: it isn't the method that decides, but your eye. Corneal thickness and shape, the degree of your refractive error, your ocular surface and your visual priorities in daily life determine what makes sense, and whether laser is the right path at all, or a lens-based solution such as the ICL or lens surgery fits better. That is exactly what we examine together in consultation.

Request a consultation

General information, it does not replace individual medical advice. Please do not include sensitive health data in the e-mail.

For referring doctors & colleagues

Technology at the current location

Laser platforms
Ziemer Z8 neo (femtosecond laser: flap, lenticule extraction) · SCHWIND AMARIS 1050 (excimer)
Diagnostics for laser planning
MS-39 (anterior-segment OCT & topography; choice of laser method) · PERAMIS (aberrometry; wavefront-guided laser planning)
Ablation profiles
Wavefront-optimised · Topography-guided · Wavefront-guided

Laser-related equipment. Full device and lens equipment (incl. biometry & lens surgery): → Technology & research. Reflects current practice (IROC Zurich); location-dependent and may change.